A few weeks ago, we shared the truth about state Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel amid massive disinformation campaigns waged by dark money PACs. The Left is scared of seeing an ethical judge focused on upholding the rule of law appointed to Wisconsin’s Supreme Court; so they have spent millions trying to convince voters that candidate Susan Crawford is the answer to our state’s problems. But we know the truth. Crawford has spent decades undermining Wisconsinites’ best interests, and she will not behave differently if elected to the state Supreme Court.
Vulgar, Blasphemous, Indecent Associations
Recently, far-left, liberal Vermont senator Bernie Sanders came to Wisconsin ostensibly on his “anti-oligarchy” tour. During his Kenosha rally held at UW-Parkside, he implied an endorsement of Susan Crawford without saying her name. Sanders said, “she has an ‘extreme idea that maybe women should be able to control their own bodies.’” The rally also included a vile song filled with blasphemy about our holy God. The lyrics are so inappropriate that we strongly suggest that you don’t look them up and read them. The timing of Sanders’ Wisconsin rallies leaves no doubt of his intention: boost voter turnout for Susan Crawford.
Then just last week, news broke that “[a] cross-dressing Democrat donor held a ‘Disney Princess Bingo’ ‘drag’ fundraiser” for Crawford. The event ad noted, “Right now more than ever we need to make sure to elect Susan Crawford to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. This is the future of Wisconsin and the LGBTQ+ Community.” Brandon Rounds, the event sponsor, also is a Madison “drag entertainer” and ‘fierce advocate for LGBTQ+ rights.’”
This exemplifies all too well what we and others mean when we say Susan Crawford is too extreme for Wisconsin.
Ties to Extreme Abortion Advocates & Transgender Transitions
Susan Crawford is no friend to the unborn. As an attorney, she represented Planned Parenthood
of Wisconsin and is now endorsed by their PAC. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin has fought for abortion expansion through all nine months of pregnancy. Important to note is that their national counterpart is the country’s second-largest provider of hormones used to assist in “gender changes.”
This year, on the 52nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Crawford posted on X, “Judge Crawford will always fight to protect Wisconsinites’ fundamental freedoms,” an obvious reference to abortion. She recently posted on X a picture of herself with a child in which she said that she would fight for that child’s “right” to an abortion.
To claim that someone has a fundamental freedom to murder another person is not only extreme, but barbaric. How could anyone trust Crawford to handle the issue of abortion fairly on our high court when she has already proven in her past actions and followed through with her campaign suggestions that she will advance the abortion lobby’s agenda?
Crawford is anything but impartial and has proven where her loyalties lie time and time again. A vote for Crawford is a vote for the abortion lobby that currently has a case before our Supreme Court to make abortion a “constitutional right” in Wisconsin.
Opposition to Parental Rights
Many voters have valid concerns about the future of school choice and parental rights if Susan Crawford is elected to the Supreme Court. Crawford’s husband co-authored a book titled, Homeschooling: The History and Philosophy of a Controversial Practice.
The book recommends that litigation on constitutional grounds occur to force legislative action
over homeschooling. A Johns Hopkins review argued the book “paint[s] parents and Christians as villains.”
If Crawford’s husband believes homeschooling is a “controversial practice” and parents are villains, how can we know that these views wouldn’t influence her decisions as a justice? We certainly cannot trust that she will recuse herself if a case comes in front of her using the legal arguments her husband used in his book to restrict homeschooling and private schooling.
Backed by Those Who Oppose Religious Liberty
Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund has endorsed Susan Crawford because they believe that Crawford would be an advocate for restricting religious liberty. One can assume that Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund believes that if Crawford is on the Court, she would vote to restrict the religious liberty and the free speech of these counselors.
When Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund announced their endorsement of Crawford, they highlighted a main reason why: When Brad Schimel was Wisconsin’s top cop, he established a volunteer chaplain program to serve those in Wisconsin’s Department of Justice. Would Freedom From Religion Foundation and Crawford oppose similar volunteer chaplain programs in our local police departments as well?
Far Left, Out-of-State Funding
A record-breaking $59 million has been spent on this pivotal election thus far. That figure alone should illustrate just how critical this race is for the future of our state. Liberal mega-donors like George Soros have given the Democratic Party of Wisconsin over $1 million to support Susan Crawford. Even the Illinois governor has chipped in at least $500,000 to ensure Wisconsin becomes as liberal as Illinois. Let’s make sure that doesn’t happen.
Please solidify your plans to vote by April 1 and share this email with friends and family so they can learn the truth about Susan Crawford.
*Header image altered to black and white.
Paid for by Wisconsin Family Action Inc. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
